Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 10:23
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
A reinvigorated push for nuclear power in space - SpaceNews
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
4 foods that can lower blood pressure naturally, according to a top cardiologist - Times of India
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
The Best Father’s Day Gifts On Amazon That Dads Can Actually Use - HuffPost
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Buffalo Trace Adds Eagle Rare 12 To Its Permanent Lineup Of Age-Stated Bourbons - Forbes
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Xbox Continues Quietly Abandoning Physical Games - Kotaku
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
AI Cracks Secret Language of Sticky Proteins Linked to Alzheimer’s - SciTechDaily
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
If women aren't shallow, why do most tall, good-looking men have girlfriends?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.